Tuesday, November 26, 2019

The Importance of Language

Part 1: Communicating Without Language
     Communicating without any spoken language was thoroughly difficult. This was largely due to the fact that my partner could not really understand any of my answers, especially when it came to more complex responses. What ended up happening was them essentially guessing multiple times what I was trying to say until I gave them a sign of approval like a nod or a thumbs up. While I ended up getting frustrated, my partner was thoroughly ammused. As time went on, the conversation ultimately started turning into more yes or no questions. Some of the more complex answers took upwards of five minutes for my partner to interpret.
     Throughout the conversation my partner was primarily in control as it was even more difficult to ask questions than to answer them. Most of the questions I would be able to ask were along the lines of, "and you?" after they asked me how my day was and I responded. So during the time my partner was the only one really able to ask questions and change topics. The power was definitely tipped in their favor as they dictated the conversation as I was really only able to respond. Not being able to change topics or ask questions definitely made me feel more submisive. It was very hard to supress the urge to speak as I got thoroughly frustrated.
     If this conversation represented two different cultures, my partners culture is far more advanced and is far more better suited to communicate more complex language. From this we could infer that their culture and society is far more advanced than mine as they can communicate more complex ideas that help them advance. They would most likely view my culture as very primitive and undevloped. To them it would essentially be like talking to a dog; a lot of what they understand would come from reading my body language and ultimately determine if I am happy or frustrated as a substitute for yes or no. A modern situation that best fits this example can be seen if we were to interact with amazon tribes that have stayed very secluded from the modern world and still live very primitive lives. These tribes have often developed their own dialect, but not understanding even the local language would make communicating even more difficult. Another example would be seen if two monolingual people from two differnt cultures were to interact. They would both view the other person as essentially underdeveloped and the power of the conversation would probably be more balanced as they both can use spoken language.

Part 2: Communicating Without Physical Embellishments
     This conversation was much easier and a lot more productive. My partner had no problem understanding me and I was better able to answer and ask questions. This time the power was better distributed evenly. However, after a while the conversation seemed more dull and topics changed more frequently. So while they had no difficulty understanding me, I believe they had more difficulty wanting to continue talking to me.
     What this conversation showed me is that physical language helps portray emotion which is just as important as spoken language when communicating effectively. Body language helps people determine our emotions when communicating such as whether or not we are happy, angry, sad, or uncomfortable. It also helps us determine if people actually want to talk to you. Therefore it is very hard to communicate effectively without using any physical language. Without emotion it's as if the words carry no meaning. It also wears out the conversation and makes it boring. It's like talking to a monotone person which makes it really confusing whether or not they want to talk to you.
     Being able to read body language is very important when it comes to survial. When interacting with a potentially hostile person you can judge when they are going to attack or when it is best to leave before they attack. You can tell when someone is mad at you or if they want to hurt you. You can tell when people are nervous as they sweat and seem uneasy. When obtaining resources epecially from other people you can tell whether or not they want to give you resources or take your resources or whether or not they feel uneasy about sharing resources. When hunting animals you can tell when the prey is relxed or caught of guard or when they are skittish, helping decide the right moment to act. When trying to reproduce it helps males determine if their advances are working and if females want to reproduce or tell them when to make the right move. Birds often obtain mates through using body language and by doing what can be interpretted as mating dances.
     Often times people who have difficulty reading body language are people who have trouble communicating in general, which can be seen in people with autism. People with autism can have trouble communicating verbally or even just have problems socially by not being able to read body language and essentially understanding the "mood" of the conversation. However, this is not just a problem people with autism face, sometimes people really just don't know how to read body language or misinterpret it. In my experience some people don't see when peoples body language indicate that they are uncomfortable or don't want to talk. The only time that I could see where reading body language is unbeneficial is when someone is trying to decieve you for what ever reason by essentially using false body language. However, often times it's difficult to know when someone is trying to decieve you.

4 comments:

  1. Good post, we had a lot of similar thoughts on how language is important, especially using body language. I feel that without body language it is hard to read what people are really saying, A good example of how seeing people and their body language gives us a more accurate idea of how they really feel would have to be when you talk to someone on the phone. If their tone of voice is just monotone we really have no way of really knowing how someone feels, They can be telling us one thing but really mean another, body language helps us decipher emotions a little more.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Part A: Good opening description of this part of the experiment.

    Good discussion on the issue of power and control.

    I agree with your conclusions regarding the two cultures and the attitudes involved.

    Regarding your real-life examples: These could be accurate but the conditions matter. Remember that we are talking about a situation where there is a power differential in the conversation, with one side having the advantage. So in the example of the Amazonian tribes, who has the advantage? If one member of the tribe finds himself among a bunch of American researchers, then that tribal member is at an distinct disadvantage. But if you have one lonely American anthropologist entering the village of one of those tribes, he is at the bottom of that power differential. It's all relative.

    Part B: Can you go beyond just your partners ability to understand you? Did you ask them their impressions of this assignment? What did they think about this? What was their reaction? Usually the most interesting part of this experiment is the response of the partner. Some have actually gotten angry and stormed out. It would have offered more information for both you and your reader if this had been expanded.

    I don't disagree with your conclusions regarding the information we receive from body language, but it goes beyond simple emotion. And you are only considering the situation where body language matches and supports the information you receive from spoken language. What does it tell you when the body language doesn't match the spoken language? Humans tend to use body language as a type of lie detector. If spoken words don't match with the body language, we are more inclined to believe the body language and doubt the words. Think about how being able to detect liars might help an individual's ability to survive and reproduce (which applies to the next section).

    Okay on the benefits of body language, but what type of benefits do you get by being able to detect liars?

    Yes, those in the autism spectrum are a good example here.

    "The only time that I could see where reading body language is unbeneficial is when someone is trying to decieve you for what ever reason by essentially using false body language. "

    But when someone is trying to deceive you, that is usually done with their words. It is very difficult to lie with your body language and you can usually detect the lie *because* of the body language (as I explain above). So this is definitely not a situation where I would not want to give up reading body language.

    But is there any situation you can think of where body language might actually mislead you, not because the person is lying but because you don't know how to read the body language? Do all cultures use the same system of body language? They all use different systems of spoken/written language, so why would we assume their body language isn't different? If you travel to another country, can you trust the information you get from their body language?

    ReplyDelete
  3. We had some similar results in that it was a bit frustrating to communicate without words. The monotone speaking was better but interest was lost in the conversation. Good info overall.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey James,

    A bit off topic, but who was your partner for part one? A friend, sibling, or other family member? I thought it was interesting how you explained that they were amused while you were actually frustrated. In your ordinary conversations, is that a regular occurrence? Or was it due to the experiment alone?

    In part two, I like how you made the point of saying that the conversation became harder to continue. I had the same creeping feeling that it was much duller than the first half of the experiment. It really goes to show how important nonverbal communication cues really are.

    Overall, I thoroughly enjoyed reading your post.

    ReplyDelete